2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2018-01-02 23:51:27 +08:00
|
|
|
Copyright 2018 The Kubernetes Authors.
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
|
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
|
You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
|
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
|
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
|
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
|
limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-27 18:47:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Code generated by informer-gen. DO NOT EDIT.
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package informers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
2018-01-04 09:47:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
v1alpha1 "k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1alpha1"
|
2017-11-22 09:04:54 +08:00
|
|
|
v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/admissionregistration/v1beta1"
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
v1 "k8s.io/api/apps/v1"
|
2017-11-22 09:04:54 +08:00
|
|
|
apps_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/apps/v1beta1"
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
v1beta2 "k8s.io/api/apps/v1beta2"
|
|
|
|
|
autoscaling_v1 "k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v1"
|
|
|
|
|
v2beta1 "k8s.io/api/autoscaling/v2beta1"
|
|
|
|
|
batch_v1 "k8s.io/api/batch/v1"
|
|
|
|
|
batch_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/batch/v1beta1"
|
|
|
|
|
v2alpha1 "k8s.io/api/batch/v2alpha1"
|
|
|
|
|
certificates_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/certificates/v1beta1"
|
|
|
|
|
core_v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
|
2017-11-23 13:48:42 +08:00
|
|
|
events_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/events/v1beta1"
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
extensions_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/extensions/v1beta1"
|
|
|
|
|
networking_v1 "k8s.io/api/networking/v1"
|
|
|
|
|
policy_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/policy/v1beta1"
|
|
|
|
|
rbac_v1 "k8s.io/api/rbac/v1"
|
|
|
|
|
rbac_v1alpha1 "k8s.io/api/rbac/v1alpha1"
|
|
|
|
|
rbac_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/rbac/v1beta1"
|
|
|
|
|
scheduling_v1alpha1 "k8s.io/api/scheduling/v1alpha1"
|
|
|
|
|
settings_v1alpha1 "k8s.io/api/settings/v1alpha1"
|
|
|
|
|
storage_v1 "k8s.io/api/storage/v1"
|
2017-11-15 14:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
storage_v1alpha1 "k8s.io/api/storage/v1alpha1"
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
storage_v1beta1 "k8s.io/api/storage/v1beta1"
|
|
|
|
|
schema "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/runtime/schema"
|
|
|
|
|
cache "k8s.io/client-go/tools/cache"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// GenericInformer is type of SharedIndexInformer which will locate and delegate to other
|
|
|
|
|
// sharedInformers based on type
|
|
|
|
|
type GenericInformer interface {
|
|
|
|
|
Informer() cache.SharedIndexInformer
|
|
|
|
|
Lister() cache.GenericLister
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type genericInformer struct {
|
|
|
|
|
informer cache.SharedIndexInformer
|
|
|
|
|
resource schema.GroupResource
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Informer returns the SharedIndexInformer.
|
|
|
|
|
func (f *genericInformer) Informer() cache.SharedIndexInformer {
|
|
|
|
|
return f.informer
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Lister returns the GenericLister.
|
|
|
|
|
func (f *genericInformer) Lister() cache.GenericLister {
|
|
|
|
|
return cache.NewGenericLister(f.Informer().GetIndexer(), f.resource)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ForResource gives generic access to a shared informer of the matching type
|
|
|
|
|
// TODO extend this to unknown resources with a client pool
|
|
|
|
|
func (f *sharedInformerFactory) ForResource(resource schema.GroupVersionResource) (GenericInformer, error) {
|
|
|
|
|
switch resource {
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=admissionregistration.k8s.io, Version=v1alpha1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("initializerconfigurations"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Admissionregistration().V1alpha1().InitializerConfigurations().Informer()}, nil
|
2017-11-22 09:04:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Group=admissionregistration.k8s.io, Version=v1beta1
|
|
|
|
|
case v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("mutatingwebhookconfigurations"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Admissionregistration().V1beta1().MutatingWebhookConfigurations().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("validatingwebhookconfigurations"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Admissionregistration().V1beta1().ValidatingWebhookConfigurations().Informer()}, nil
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=apps, Version=v1
|
|
|
|
|
case v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("controllerrevisions"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1().ControllerRevisions().Informer()}, nil
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("daemonsets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1().DaemonSets().Informer()}, nil
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
case v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("deployments"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1().Deployments().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("replicasets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1().ReplicaSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("statefulsets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1().StatefulSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Group=apps, Version=v1beta1
|
2017-11-22 09:04:54 +08:00
|
|
|
case apps_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("controllerrevisions"):
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta1().ControllerRevisions().Informer()}, nil
|
2017-11-22 09:04:54 +08:00
|
|
|
case apps_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("deployments"):
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta1().Deployments().Informer()}, nil
|
2017-11-22 09:04:54 +08:00
|
|
|
case apps_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("statefulsets"):
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta1().StatefulSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=apps, Version=v1beta2
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case v1beta2.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("controllerrevisions"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta2().ControllerRevisions().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case v1beta2.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("daemonsets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta2().DaemonSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case v1beta2.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("deployments"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta2().Deployments().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case v1beta2.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("replicasets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta2().ReplicaSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case v1beta2.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("statefulsets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Apps().V1beta2().StatefulSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=autoscaling, Version=v1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case autoscaling_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("horizontalpodautoscalers"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Autoscaling().V1().HorizontalPodAutoscalers().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=autoscaling, Version=v2beta1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case v2beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("horizontalpodautoscalers"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Autoscaling().V2beta1().HorizontalPodAutoscalers().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=batch, Version=v1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case batch_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("jobs"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Batch().V1().Jobs().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=batch, Version=v1beta1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case batch_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("cronjobs"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Batch().V1beta1().CronJobs().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=batch, Version=v2alpha1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case v2alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("cronjobs"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Batch().V2alpha1().CronJobs().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=certificates.k8s.io, Version=v1beta1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case certificates_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("certificatesigningrequests"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Certificates().V1beta1().CertificateSigningRequests().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=core, Version=v1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("componentstatuses"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().ComponentStatuses().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("configmaps"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().ConfigMaps().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("endpoints"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().Endpoints().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("events"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().Events().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("limitranges"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().LimitRanges().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("namespaces"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().Namespaces().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("nodes"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().Nodes().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("persistentvolumes"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().PersistentVolumes().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("persistentvolumeclaims"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().PersistentVolumeClaims().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("pods"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().Pods().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("podtemplates"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().PodTemplates().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("replicationcontrollers"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().ReplicationControllers().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("resourcequotas"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().ResourceQuotas().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("secrets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().Secrets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("services"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().Services().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case core_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("serviceaccounts"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Core().V1().ServiceAccounts().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-23 13:48:42 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=events.k8s.io, Version=v1beta1
|
|
|
|
|
case events_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("events"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Events().V1beta1().Events().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=extensions, Version=v1beta1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case extensions_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("daemonsets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Extensions().V1beta1().DaemonSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case extensions_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("deployments"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Extensions().V1beta1().Deployments().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case extensions_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("ingresses"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Extensions().V1beta1().Ingresses().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case extensions_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("podsecuritypolicies"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Extensions().V1beta1().PodSecurityPolicies().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case extensions_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("replicasets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Extensions().V1beta1().ReplicaSets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=networking.k8s.io, Version=v1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case networking_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("networkpolicies"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Networking().V1().NetworkPolicies().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=policy, Version=v1beta1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case policy_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("poddisruptionbudgets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Policy().V1beta1().PodDisruptionBudgets().Informer()}, nil
|
2018-02-23 12:38:30 +08:00
|
|
|
case policy_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("podsecuritypolicies"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Policy().V1beta1().PodSecurityPolicies().Informer()}, nil
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=rbac.authorization.k8s.io, Version=v1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case rbac_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("clusterroles"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1().ClusterRoles().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("clusterrolebindings"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1().ClusterRoleBindings().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("roles"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1().Roles().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("rolebindings"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1().RoleBindings().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=rbac.authorization.k8s.io, Version=v1alpha1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case rbac_v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("clusterroles"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1alpha1().ClusterRoles().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("clusterrolebindings"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1alpha1().ClusterRoleBindings().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("roles"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1alpha1().Roles().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("rolebindings"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1alpha1().RoleBindings().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=rbac.authorization.k8s.io, Version=v1beta1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case rbac_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("clusterroles"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1beta1().ClusterRoles().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("clusterrolebindings"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1beta1().ClusterRoleBindings().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("roles"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1beta1().Roles().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
case rbac_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("rolebindings"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Rbac().V1beta1().RoleBindings().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=scheduling.k8s.io, Version=v1alpha1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case scheduling_v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("priorityclasses"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Scheduling().V1alpha1().PriorityClasses().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=settings.k8s.io, Version=v1alpha1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case settings_v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("podpresets"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Settings().V1alpha1().PodPresets().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=storage.k8s.io, Version=v1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case storage_v1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("storageclasses"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Storage().V1().StorageClasses().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-15 14:05:27 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=storage.k8s.io, Version=v1alpha1
|
|
|
|
|
case storage_v1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("volumeattachments"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Storage().V1alpha1().VolumeAttachments().Informer()}, nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge pull request #54786 from shiywang/bump-protobuf
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55093, 54966, 55047, 54971, 54786). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
vendor update: github.com/golang/protobuf
When I'm working on PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54782, I met a problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372, which I think we need to update our vendor of protobuf
and I ask Dr. Stefan for suggestion, here is our coversation
shiywang [5:09 PM]
hi, Dr. Stefan i'm sorry to bother, I have a simple question, I was working on a pr which need to use protobuf custom field, and I run into this problem here: https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/372 which I think is due to our codebase's protobuf vendor is too old `vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf`, do you think I can update that vendor to lastest one ? also I noticed there's also an extend package called `vendor/github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto` what's the releationship between those two ? which one should I update ?
sttts
[5:11 PM]
hi
[5:11]
don't know much about the proto internals either, @claytonc is probably the only one
[5:12]
create a vendor/github.com/golang/protobuf bump PR and assign it to him
shiywang [5:12 PM]
sounds good, thank you sir
so
/assign @smarterclayton
for suggestion, thanks
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes-commit: 5b7ce60fcebea445b7852d8dc2bce141a2bd7a3a
2017-11-07 12:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Group=storage.k8s.io, Version=v1beta1
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
case storage_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("storageclasses"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Storage().V1beta1().StorageClasses().Informer()}, nil
|
2018-02-05 00:00:38 +08:00
|
|
|
case storage_v1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithResource("volumeattachments"):
|
|
|
|
|
return &genericInformer{resource: resource.GroupResource(), informer: f.Storage().V1beta1().VolumeAttachments().Informer()}, nil
|
2017-10-19 17:32:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("no informer found for %v", resource)
|
|
|
|
|
}
|